Shahi Khan vs The Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/16551/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010335792026

Filing Number

WP/24482/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

WP/16551/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Coram

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

PASSPORT OFFICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shahi Khan

    Adv. MOHD MUZAFFER ULLAH KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India

  2. 2.The Regional Passport Officer

  3. 3.The State of Telangana

    Adv. GP FOR HOME

  4. 4.The Commissioner of Police

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Admission (Central Govt.)

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/16551/2026 - Shahi Khan v. Union of India The High Court of Telangana heard arguments on 11.06.2026 regarding Shahi Khan's passport application petition. The Central Government's Standing Counsel submitted that the petitioner failed to provide family members' identity proofs during the initial application. The court granted the petitioner's request for time to file the required ID proofs at the passport office. The case was adjourned for further orders to 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Nagesh Bheemapaka

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    P Naveen RaoView PDF

  6. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16551/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/16551/2026 - Shahi Khan v. Union of India The High Court of Telangana heard arguments on 11.06.2026 regarding Shahi Khan's passport application petition. The Central Government's Standing Counsel submitted that the petitioner failed to provide family members' identity proofs during the initial application. The court granted the petitioner's request for time to file the required ID proofs at the passport office. The case was adjourned for further orders to 18.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case