Gooduri Vishal vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/7761/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010329132026

Filing Number

CRLP/8936/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CRLP/7761/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the proceedings U/s.498-A I.P.C ( 65 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gooduri Vishal

    Adv. YOGESHWAR RAJ SAXENA

  2. 2.Gooduri Sathyanarayana,

  3. 3.Gooduri Latha,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Smt.M. Shravani

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Case Summary: CRLP 7761/2026 The High Court of Telangana heard a criminal petition by three accused seeking to quash proceedings in a lower court case. The petitioners and the opposing party (respondent No.2) have reached a settlement with a Memorandum of Understanding, which was approved by the Family Court on 17.02.2026. Both parties have filed applications to compound the offence and record the compromise. The court directed the case file to be transmitted to the High Court Legal Services Committee and ordered both parties to appear before it by 12.06.2026 for identification. The case was adjourned to 17.06.2026 for further consideration of the compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/7761/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRLP 7761/2026 The High Court of Telangana heard a criminal petition by three accused seeking to quash proceedings in a lower court case. The petitioners and the opposing party (respondent No.2) have reached a settlement with a Memorandum of Understanding, which was approved by the Family Court on 17.02.2026. Both parties have filed applications to compound the offence and record the compromise. The court directed the case file to be transmitted to the High Court Legal Services Committee and ordered both parties to appear before it by 12.06.2026 for identification. The case was adjourned to 17.06.2026 for further consideration of the compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case