Adnan Hussain Siddiqi vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/7184/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED NO COSTS on 14th May 2026.
CNR: HBHC010313482026
Filing Number
CRLP/8510/2026
Filing Date
01-May-2026
Registration No
CRLP/7184/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
E.V. Venugopal
Coram
E.V. Venugopal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED NO COSTS
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Adnan Hussain Siddiqi
Adv. NYSHADHAM CHANDRA SEKHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
Case Summary: CRLP/7184/2026 - Adnan Hussain Siddiqi v. State of Telangana Adnan Hussain Siddiqi sought pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of BNSS for offences under Sections 118(1), 115(2) read with 3(5) of BNS in FIR No.252/2026 (Banjara Hills Police Station). The petitioner's counsel submitted that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and planned to file a compromise petition in the related pending quash petition (Crl.P.No.5945/2026). The Additional Public Prosecutor agreed with this settlement position. The court found no further adjudication was necessary given the parties' stated intention to file a compromise petition and accordingly closed the criminal petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
K. Sujana
-
06-May-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
06-May-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
04-May-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/7184/2026
Case Summary: CRLP/7184/2026 - Adnan Hussain Siddiqi v. State of Telangana Adnan Hussain Siddiqi sought pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of BNSS for offences under Sections 118(1), 115(2) read with 3(5) of BNS in FIR No.252/2026 (Banjara Hills Police Station). The petitioner's counsel submitted that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and planned to file a compromise petition in the related pending quash petition (Crl.P.No.5945/2026). The Additional Public Prosecutor agreed with this settlement position. The court found no further adjudication was necessary given the parties' stated intention to file a compromise petition and accordingly closed the criminal petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts