Shaik Peervali, vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/7559/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010307562026

Filing Number

CRLP/8338/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/7559/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

T.madhavi Devi

Coram

T.madhavi Devi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shaik Peervali,

    Adv. LAMBA SAI KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    T.madhavi DeviView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana granted bail to Shaik Peervali (Accused No.3) in a drug possession case involving 52 kgs of dry Ganja, finding that the investigation was substantially complete and he had spent over 134 days in judicial custody with no criminal antecedents. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, weekly appearances before the Investigating Officer for eight weeks, and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  4. 06-May-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/7559/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana granted bail to Shaik Peervali (Accused No.3) in a drug possession case involving 52 kgs of dry Ganja, finding that the investigation was substantially complete and he had spent over 134 days in judicial custody with no criminal antecedents. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, weekly appearances before the Investigating Officer for eight weeks, and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case