DURGAM DAMODAR vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES III — WP/15138/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010300362026

Filing Number

WP/21883/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/15138/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

K. Sarath

Coram

K. Sarath

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DURGAM DAMODAR

    Adv. RAMU NALLAMOTHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR SERVICES III

  2. 2.The Director of Treasuries and Accounts

  3. 3.The District Treasury Officer

  4. 4.The Sub-Treasury Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    K. SarathView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/15138/2026 Durgam Damodar v. The State of Telangana The Telangana High Court disposed of a retired LFL Head Master's writ petition seeking release of admitted retirement benefits totaling approximately ₹59.9 lakhs. Although token numbers for gratuity, commutation, leave encashment, and other retiral dues were generated in July-September 2025, the treasury authorities had not released the funds. Justice K. Sarath directed respondents to release the entire amount within six weeks, with interest at 10% per annum from the due date if delayed, following an earlier Division Bench precedent on identical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Admission (Finance and Planning)

    K. Sarath

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15138/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15138/2026 Durgam Damodar v. The State of Telangana The Telangana High Court disposed of a retired LFL Head Master's writ petition seeking release of admitted retirement benefits totaling approximately ₹59.9 lakhs. Although token numbers for gratuity, commutation, leave encashment, and other retiral dues were generated in July-September 2025, the treasury authorities had not released the funds. Justice K. Sarath directed respondents to release the entire amount within six weeks, with interest at 10% per annum from the due date if delayed, following an earlier Division Bench precedent on identical grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case