Smt. K. Prashanthi vs Sri L. Vittal Reddy — CMA/202/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010285692026

Filing Number

CMA/20823/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMA/202/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Coram

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CMA ( 6 )

Sub-Category

ORDER 43 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. K. Prashanthi

    Adv. B N SWAMIJI

  2. 2.Sri Kura Anand

  3. 3.Sri Vadakattu Balaraju

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri L. Vittal Reddy

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

    Case CMA/202/2026 Summary: On 16.06.2026, the Telangana High Court adjourned CMA No. 202 of 2026 (along with CMA No. 191) to 19.06.2026 after noting that counsel for appellants Smt. K. Prashanthi, Sri Kura Anand, and Sri Vadakattu Balaraju was not ready for the second consecutive day. The respondent's counsel had been served with case papers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  6. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA/202/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case CMA/202/2026 Summary: On 16.06.2026, the Telangana High Court adjourned CMA No. 202 of 2026 (along with CMA No. 191) to 19.06.2026 after noting that counsel for appellants Smt. K. Prashanthi, Sri Kura Anand, and Sri Vadakattu Balaraju was not ready for the second consecutive day. The respondent's counsel had been served with case papers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case