Bhukya Srinivas vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/14945/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010281632019

Filing Number

WP/22300/2019

Filing Date

17-Jul-2019

Registration No

WP/14945/2019

Registration Date

18-Jul-2019

Judge

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Coram

Suddala Chalapathi Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP. ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhukya Srinivas

    Adv. GOPINATH LAKKINENI

  2. 2.G.Venkateswar Rao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

  2. 2.The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration

  3. 3.The District Collector

    Adv. GP FOR REVENUE (TG)

  4. 4.The Kothagudem Municipality

    Adv. KRISHNA REDDY PUTTA (SC MUNCIPALITIES)

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal(specially Identified Cases)

    Suddala Chalapathi Rao

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Suddala Chalapathi RaoView PDF

    On 16.06.2026, the court found no representation on behalf of the petitioners and adjourned the matter to 18.06.2026 under the caption "For Dismissal", indicating the petition was likely to be dismissed due to petitioner's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Specially Identified Cases

    Laxmi Narayana Alishetty

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Laxmi Narayana AlishettyView PDF

  6. 31-Mar-2022

    Adjourned

    A.abhishek Reddy

  7. 19-Jul-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/14945/2019

casestatus.in Summary

On 16.06.2026, the court found no representation on behalf of the petitioners and adjourned the matter to 18.06.2026 under the caption "For Dismissal", indicating the petition was likely to be dismissed due to petitioner's non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case