Shubham Singh vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE — WP/13941/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: For Orders. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010272042024
Filing Number
WP/20155/2024
Filing Date
04-Jun-2024
Registration No
WP/13941/2024
Registration Date
04-Jun-2024
Judge
E.V. Venugopal
Coram
E.V. Venugopal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
EXCISE ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shubham Singh
Adv. DAMODAR MUNDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE
-
2.The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise
-
3.Deputy Commissioner
-
4.The Excise Superintendent of Police
-
5.The Station House Officer
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
For Orders
E.V. Venugopal
-
31-Mar-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
In writ petition WP.No 13941 of 2024 before the High Court of Telangana, the court adjourned the case to 28.04.2026 at the request of the Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise to file a counter affidavit. The petitioners' counsel was present during the hearing on 31.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
For Orders
E.V. Venugopal
-
17-Mar-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
For Orders
E.V. Venugopal
-
10-Mar-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
-
28-Jun-2024
Admission (Excise)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
25-Jun-2024
Admission (Excise)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
18-Jun-2024
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
Admission (Excise)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
10-Jun-2024
Admission (Excise)
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
05-Jun-2024
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
05-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP/13941/2024
In writ petition WP.No 13941 of 2024 before the High Court of Telangana, the court adjourned the case to 28.04.2026 at the request of the Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise to file a counter affidavit. The petitioners' counsel was present during the hearing on 31.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts