Bhavyas Tulasi Vanam Owners Welfare Association, (Regd.No.682/ vs State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/15462/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HBHC010248032020

Filing Number

WP/19827/2020

Filing Date

10-Sep-2020

Registration No

WP/15462/2020

Registration Date

10-Sep-2020

Judge

Laxmi Narayana Alishetty

Coram

Laxmi Narayana Alishetty

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF HYDERABAD ( 25 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhavyas Tulasi Vanam Owners Welfare Association, (Regd.No.682/

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

  2. 2.Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

    Adv. SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY(SC FORGHMC)

  3. 3.The Zonal Commissioner

  4. 4.The Deputy Commissioner

    Adv. M DHANANJAY REDDY (SC FOR GHMC)

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Specially Identified Cases

    Laxmi Narayana Alishetty

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Laxmi Narayana AlishettyView PDF

    The case has been adjourned to 02.07.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. The court directed the registry to add Sri K. Ravi Mahender as the standing counsel for respondent numbers 2-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Specially Identified Cases

    Laxmi Narayana Alishetty

  5. 28-Sep-2020

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    A.rajasheker Reddy

  6. 21-Sep-2020

    Admission (Municipal Admn.)

    A.rajasheker Reddy

  7. 15-Sep-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15462/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The case has been adjourned to 02.07.2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. The court directed the registry to add Sri K. Ravi Mahender as the standing counsel for respondent numbers 2-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case