Janga Rajeswhari vs The State of Telangana Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL — WP/11233/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010234562026

Filing Number

WP/16871/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/11233/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Coram

Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

HABEAS CORPUS ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Janga Rajeswhari

    Adv. PASHAM TRIVIKRAM REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

  2. 2.The Superintendent of Police

  3. 3.The Station House Officer

  4. 4.The Commissioner of Police

  5. 5.The Station House Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Moushumi Bhattacharya , Gadi Praveen Kumar

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Moushumi Bhattacharya,gadi Praveen KumarView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana in W.P. No. 11233 of 2026 adjourned the matter to 16.04.2026, directing the Assistant Government Pleader to file written instructions substantiating the government's submission that respondents have neither detained nor arrested the alleged detenu. This is an interim procedural order in a habeas corpus petition awaiting further documentation before final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/11233/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana in W.P. No. 11233 of 2026 adjourned the matter to 16.04.2026, directing the Assistant Government Pleader to file written instructions substantiating the government's submission that respondents have neither detained nor arrested the alleged detenu. This is an interim procedural order in a habeas corpus petition awaiting further documentation before final determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case