Dubbaka Narsimha vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR ASSIGNMENT — WP/11189/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: Admission (Revenue). Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Admission (Revenue) Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HBHC010234342026

Filing Number

WP/16857/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/11189/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Coram

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANEOUS ( 89 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dubbaka Narsimha

    Adv. KIRAN PALAKURTHI

  2. 2.Dubbaka Galaiah

  3. 3.Dubbaka Beeraiah

  4. 4.Dubbaka Narsimha

  5. 5.Dubbaka Yadaiah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR ASSIGNMENT

  2. 2.The Joint Collector

    Adv. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

    Adv. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT

  4. 4.The Tahsildar

    Adv. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT

  5. 5.The Bhoodan Yagna Board

    Adv. KIRAN KUMAR GATTU

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Admission (Revenue)

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF

    The case was adjourned to 10.06.2026. The court noted that the matter requires examination regarding the genuineness of a letter dated 21.04.2014, and directed Respondent No. 5 to file a counter-affidavit by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/11189/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The case was adjourned to 10.06.2026. The court noted that the matter requires examination regarding the genuineness of a letter dated 21.04.2014, and directed Respondent No. 5 to file a counter-affidavit by the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case