Vemuri Srinivas Rao vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/11184/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HBHC010233642026
Filing Number
WP/16800/2026
Filing Date
10-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/11184/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Coram
B.Vijaysen Reddy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PATTADAR PASS BOOKS ( 49 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vemuri Srinivas Rao
Adv. RAPOLU ABHINAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE
-
2.The Commissioner
Adv. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
-
3.The District Collector
-
4.The Tahsildar
-
5.The Assistant Commissioner
-
6.The Executive Officer
-
7.Gundu Madhusudhan Rao
-
8.Cherukuri Satyambabu
-
9.Karengula Ramakotamma
-
10.Karengula Saidulu
-
11.Karengula Venkatamma
-
12.Kukkadapu Bujjamma
-
13.Veeraboina Venkanna
-
14.Bomma Veerababu
-
15.Bomma Shamamma
-
16.Bomma Lingaiah
-
17.Shaik Mahmooda
-
18.Vemuri Ramulaiah
-
19.Bheemapangu Ramakrishna
-
20.Bheemapangu Biksham
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
22-Apr-2026
For Admission
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
15-Apr-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
The writ petition W.P. No. 11184 of 2026 before the High Court of Telangana has been adjourned and listed for hearing on 22.04.2026 in the Motion List at the request of the Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments representing respondents 2 to 5. No substantive order on merits has been passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
For Admission
B.Vijaysen Reddy
-
13-Apr-2026
B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11184/2026
The writ petition W.P. No. 11184 of 2026 before the High Court of Telangana has been adjourned and listed for hearing on 22.04.2026 in the Motion List at the request of the Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments representing respondents 2 to 5. No substantive order on merits has been passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts