Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 2 vs High Radius Technologies Private Limited — ITTA/78/2026

Case under Income Tax Act Section 260A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HBHC010233012026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2026

Filing Number

ITTA/16756/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

ITTA/78/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda

Coram

P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ITTA ( 13 )

Sub-Category

U/Sec. 143 Assessment ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 2

    Adv. J SUNITHA (SR SC FOR INCOM TAX)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.High Radius Technologies Private Limited

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    P.sam Koshy,narsing Rao NandikondaView PDF

    Case Summary: ITTA/78/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Telangana admitted the appeal for final hearing on three substantial questions of law relating to transfer pricing methodology, comparables selection, and assessment procedures under the Income Tax Act. Key Details: The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax challenged the ITAT's order regarding exclusion of comparable companies (L&T Infotec, Tata Elesi, Wipro, Nihilent, Great Software Laboratory, Cubage Software) based on functional dissimilarity in transfer pricing analysis. The court directed notice to respondent High Radius Technologies Private Limited and listed the appeal for final hearing in the usual course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ITTA/78/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ITTA/78/2026 Outcome: The High Court of Telangana admitted the appeal for final hearing on three substantial questions of law relating to transfer pricing methodology, comparables selection, and assessment procedures under the Income Tax Act. Key Details: The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax challenged the ITAT's order regarding exclusion of comparable companies (L&T Infotec, Tata Elesi, Wipro, Nihilent, Great Software Laboratory, Cubage Software) based on functional dissimilarity in transfer pricing analysis. The court directed notice to respondent High Radius Technologies Private Limited and listed the appeal for final hearing in the usual course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case