Sappidi Venkat Reddy vs State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5429/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010231822026

Filing Number

CRLP/6511/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5429/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sappidi Venkat Reddy

    Adv. KANUMURI KALYANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.M.Devender Reddy

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Telangana disposed of the criminal petition seeking to quash FIR No. 192/2025 against the petitioner for offences under BNS sections 329(3), 324(3), and 352. The court directed the Investigating Officer to strictly follow Section 35(3) of the BNSS and the Supreme Court's guidelines from *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* while proceeding against the petitioner, and allowed the petitioner to raise all available legal pleas. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

  7. 13-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5429/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Telangana disposed of the criminal petition seeking to quash FIR No. 192/2025 against the petitioner for offences under BNS sections 329(3), 324(3), and 352. The court directed the Investigating Officer to strictly follow Section 35(3) of the BNSS and the Supreme Court's guidelines from *Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar* while proceeding against the petitioner, and allowed the petitioner to raise all available legal pleas. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case