Neerati Shivakumar, vs The State of Telangana through P.S. Hanumakonda, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5415/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010231282026
Filing Number
CRLP/6495/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLP/5415/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
K. Sujana
Coram
K. Sujana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Neerati Shivakumar,
Adv. ALLURI DIVAKAR REDDY
-
2.Neerati Laxmi,
-
3.Neerati Venkatesh,
-
4.Girimalla Sangeetha,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana through P.S. Hanumakonda, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Telangana High Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused family members (Accused Nos. 1-3 and 6) in a case involving allegations of breach of promise to marry, caste-based insults, abuse, and threats. The court found that allegations against the petitioners were primarily based on verbal accusations with no concrete evidence, investigation was still ongoing, and their specific individual roles remained unestablished. Bail was granted subject to conditions including personal bond of Rs. 25,000 each, weekly appearance before investigating officers for eight weeks, and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
For Orders
K. Sujana
-
17-Apr-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
10-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/5415/2026
Court Decision Summary The Telangana High Court granted anticipatory bail to four accused family members (Accused Nos. 1-3 and 6) in a case involving allegations of breach of promise to marry, caste-based insults, abuse, and threats. The court found that allegations against the petitioners were primarily based on verbal accusations with no concrete evidence, investigation was still ongoing, and their specific individual roles remained unestablished. Bail was granted subject to conditions including personal bond of Rs. 25,000 each, weekly appearance before investigating officers for eight weeks, and cooperation with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts