Anil Aqthar Khan Chowdary vs The Union of India Advocate - V RAM MOHAN REDDY — WP/11053/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: Admission (Central Govt.). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010231122026
Filing Number
WP/16623/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/11053/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Renuka Yara
Coram
Renuka Yara
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
NATIONALISED BANKS ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anil Aqthar Khan Chowdary
Adv. CH SATYASADHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Union of India Advocate - V RAM MOHAN REDDY
-
2.The ICICI Bank
-
3.The Inspector In-charge
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Admission (Central Govt.)
Renuka Yara
-
13-Apr-2026
Renuka YaraView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Renuka YaraView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Renuka YaraView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Renuka YaraView PDF
Summary: The High Court for the State of Telangana issued a "Show Cause Notice Before Admission" in Writ Petition No. 11053 of 2026. The petitioner challenged the freezing of his ICICI Bank savings account by respondent authorities, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to de-freeze the account and restore operational access. The court directed ICICI Bank and Cyber PS Kolkata to show cause on or before 15.06.2026 why the writ petition should not be admitted, and adjourned the matter to that date for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11053/2026
Summary: The High Court for the State of Telangana issued a "Show Cause Notice Before Admission" in Writ Petition No. 11053 of 2026. The petitioner challenged the freezing of his ICICI Bank savings account by respondent authorities, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to de-freeze the account and restore operational access. The court directed ICICI Bank and Cyber PS Kolkata to show cause on or before 15.06.2026 why the writ petition should not be admitted, and adjourned the matter to that date for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts