Kayapally Savithri vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5430/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 05th October 2026.
CNR: HBHC010231002026
Filing Number
CRLP/6486/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLP/5430/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
J Sreenivas Rao
Coram
J Sreenivas Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.482 Cr.p.c Other offences not covered(Misc.) ( 75 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kayapally Savithri
Adv. KADIRE AJITH REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.Vemulapally Venkata Krishna Rao
Case History
-
05-Oct-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Oct-2026
For Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
13-Apr-2026
J Sreenivas RaoView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
J Sreenivas RaoView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
J Sreenivas RaoView PDF
Summary The High Court of Telangana issued a Notice Before Admission on a Criminal Revision Petition (CRLP No. 5430 of 2026) filed by Kayapally Savithri (Accused No.3) seeking to quash criminal proceedings against her for offences under IPC Sections 447, 352, 506, 504 R/w 34. The court directed the complainant to show cause by 05.10.2026 as to why the petition should not be admitted. The petitioner's personal appearance before the trial court has been dispensed with, subject to representation by counsel at all hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/5430/2026
Summary The High Court of Telangana issued a Notice Before Admission on a Criminal Revision Petition (CRLP No. 5430 of 2026) filed by Kayapally Savithri (Accused No.3) seeking to quash criminal proceedings against her for offences under IPC Sections 447, 352, 506, 504 R/w 34. The court directed the complainant to show cause by 05.10.2026 as to why the petition should not be admitted. The petitioner's personal appearance before the trial court has been dispensed with, subject to representation by counsel at all hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts