Mr. Perala Sri Vidya, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5421/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010230882026

Filing Number

CRLP/6483/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5421/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mr. Perala Sri Vidya,

    Adv. SAINI ARAVIND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court granted regular bail to Smt. Perla Sri Vidya, an accused Director in a chit fund fraud case involving charges under IPC Section 420 and the TSPDFEA Act, 1999. The court considered her prolonged incarceration since February 14, 2026, and found that while serious allegations existed, her bail plea merited consideration given her status and detention period, applying conditions from a related bail order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    K. Sujana

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court granted regular bail to Smt. Perla Sri Vidya, an accused Director in a chit fund fraud case involving charges under IPC Section 420 and the TSPDFEA Act, 1999. The court considered her prolonged incarceration since February 14, 2026, and found that while serious allegations existed, her bail plea merited consideration given her status and detention period, applying conditions from a related bail order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case