Bheemulu @ Bheemappa vs State of Telangana, through S H O Kopdangal, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5412/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010230762026

Filing Number

CRLP/6479/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5412/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bheemulu @ Bheemappa

    Adv. N RAVI KUMAR

  2. 2.Chakali Bheemulu @ Bheemappa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana, through S H O Kopdangal, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    Court Summary The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the two accused (Nos. 6 & 8) charged with wrongfully restraining and attacking persons with stones, sticks, and iron tent anchors under BNS Sections 126(2), 109, and 324(2). The court found custodial interrogation unnecessary because the injuries were simple in nature and other co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was conditional on surrender within two weeks, execution of Rs. 25,000 personal bonds with sureties, weekly reporting to the investigating officer on Wednesdays for eight weeks, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5412/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the two accused (Nos. 6 & 8) charged with wrongfully restraining and attacking persons with stones, sticks, and iron tent anchors under BNS Sections 126(2), 109, and 324(2). The court found custodial interrogation unnecessary because the injuries were simple in nature and other co-accused had already been granted bail. Bail was conditional on surrender within two weeks, execution of Rs. 25,000 personal bonds with sureties, weekly reporting to the investigating officer on Wednesdays for eight weeks, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case