Gland Pharma Limited vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV — WP/11014/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: HBHC010230752026
Filing Number
WP/16596/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/11014/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
N.v.shravan Kumar
Coram
N.v.shravan Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
NOT TO DEMOLISH THE STRUCTURE ( 69 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gland Pharma Limited
Adv. SHAILAJA R
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV
-
2.Cyberabad Municipal Corporation
-
3.Zonal Commissioner
-
4.Deputy Commissioner
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
N.v.shravan KumarView PDF
SUMMARY: The Telangana High Court extended the interim order in Writ Petition No. 11014 of 2026 filed by Gland Pharma Limited against municipal authorities attempting to demolish the company's compound wall without proper notice or land acquisition proceedings. The case has been adjourned to 15.06.2026, with the respondents granted time to file their counter-affidavit while the protective interim order remains in effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
N.v.shravan Kumar
-
27-Apr-2026
N.v.shravan KumarView PDF
-
27-Apr-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
N.v.shravan Kumar
-
13-Apr-2026
N.v.shravan KumarView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Admission (Municipal Admn.)
N.v.shravan Kumar
-
10-Apr-2026
N.v.shravan KumarView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11014/2026
SUMMARY: The Telangana High Court extended the interim order in Writ Petition No. 11014 of 2026 filed by Gland Pharma Limited against municipal authorities attempting to demolish the company's compound wall without proper notice or land acquisition proceedings. The case has been adjourned to 15.06.2026, with the respondents granted time to file their counter-affidavit while the protective interim order remains in effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts