Sangadi Santhosh vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5408/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010230582026
Filing Number
CRLP/6474/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLP/5408/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
K. Sujana
Coram
K. Sujana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sangadi Santhosh
Adv. DUVVURI SURYA NARAYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
Summary: The Telangana High Court granted bail to Sangadi Santhosh, accused in an NDPS Act case involving possession of MDMA and ganja for commercial sale, despite the prosecution's opposition based on the large quantity of contraband. The court allowed the petition considering that the petitioner had been in jail since November 6, 2025, the charge sheet remained unfiled, he had no prior criminal record, and minimal independent evidence connected him to the offense beyond his confession. Bail was granted subject to executing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and appearing before the police station every Monday for eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
K. Sujana
-
20-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
20-Apr-2026
Interlocutory (Regular Bails)
K. Sujana
-
17-Apr-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
10-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/5408/2026
Summary: The Telangana High Court granted bail to Sangadi Santhosh, accused in an NDPS Act case involving possession of MDMA and ganja for commercial sale, despite the prosecution's opposition based on the large quantity of contraband. The court allowed the petition considering that the petitioner had been in jail since November 6, 2025, the charge sheet remained unfiled, he had no prior criminal record, and minimal independent evidence connected him to the offense beyond his confession. Bail was granted subject to executing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and appearing before the police station every Monday for eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts