Syed Abdullah Quadri vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5395/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Status: For Admission. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

For Admission Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HBHC010227462026

Filing Number

CRLP/6382/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5395/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Other offences not covered(Misc.) ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Syed Abdullah Quadri

    Adv. MOHAMMED ASLAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.P. Chandramouli

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  3. 11-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Telangana dispensed with the personal presence of petitioner/accused No.2 (Syed Abdullah Quadri) in criminal case C.C.No. 11211 of 2024, allowing him to be represented through counsel on each hearing date. The court directed that if the petitioner's presence is specifically required, he must appear; otherwise, the trial court may proceed in accordance with law in case of non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5395/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Telangana dispensed with the personal presence of petitioner/accused No.2 (Syed Abdullah Quadri) in criminal case C.C.No. 11211 of 2024, allowing him to be represented through counsel on each hearing date. The court directed that if the petitioner's presence is specifically required, he must appear; otherwise, the trial court may proceed in accordance with law in case of non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case