Shravan Kumar Agarwal vs State of Telangana, Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/11278/2016

Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HBHC010226252016

Filing Number

WP/59543/2016

Filing Date

04-Apr-2016

Registration No

WP/11278/2016

Registration Date

04-Apr-2016

Judge

Anil Kumar Jukanti

Coram

Anil Kumar Jukanti

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

DISPOSSESSION ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shravan Kumar Agarwal

    Adv. P LAKSHMA REDDY

  2. 2.Sumith Kumar Agarwal

  3. 3.Raj esh Kumar Agarwal

  4. 4.Ajay Agarwal

  5. 5.Pradeep Kumar Agarwal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana, Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector,

    Adv. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT

  3. 3.The Tahasildar,

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Interlocutory(revenue)

    Anil Kumar Jukanti

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Anil Kumar JukantiView PDF

    Summary of WP/11278/2016 On 08.06.2026, the Telangana High Court adjourned the case for further hearing on 15.06.2026. The petitioners sought to challenge land-related claims involving property (180 square yards) purchased from vendors R.D. Bhopal and Krishna Parathpar Rao, relying on an earlier Land Grabbing Tribunal decision that held the property was not government land and the vendors were not land grabbers. The Assistant Government Pleader requested time to obtain instructions, and the Registry was directed to add the Government Pleader for Assignment to the cause list. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Sep-2021

    Adjourned

    A.abhishek Reddy

  5. 06-Apr-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Apr-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/11278/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/11278/2016 On 08.06.2026, the Telangana High Court adjourned the case for further hearing on 15.06.2026. The petitioners sought to challenge land-related claims involving property (180 square yards) purchased from vendors R.D. Bhopal and Krishna Parathpar Rao, relying on an earlier Land Grabbing Tribunal decision that held the property was not government land and the vendors were not land grabbers. The Assistant Government Pleader requested time to obtain instructions, and the Registry was directed to add the Government Pleader for Assignment to the cause list. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case