Mohd Ali @ Abdul Ali vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5323/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010225532026

Filing Number

CRLP/6314/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5323/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c under S.C.and S.T.Act ( 67 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohd Ali @ Abdul Ali

    Adv. V POORNASRI

  2. 2.MD.Umar

  3. 3.Abdul Masjid

  4. 4.MD.Abbas

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Mudavath Bujji

    Adv. RAPOLU BHASKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition filed by four accused seeking to quash proceedings under the SC/ST (POA) Act, finding the grounds required adjudication by the trial court. The court dispensed with the personal appearance of accused nos. 2-4 in the trial court, conditioned on their legal representation at each hearing and compliance with trial court directives when presence is specifically required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Admission.

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition filed by four accused seeking to quash proceedings under the SC/ST (POA) Act, finding the grounds required adjudication by the trial court. The court dispensed with the personal appearance of accused nos. 2-4 in the trial court, conditioned on their legal representation at each hearing and compliance with trial court directives when presence is specifically required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case