Dr. Sudeep Veer vs The Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/10934/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010224702026
Filing Number
WP/16186/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/10934/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda
Coram
P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ( 91 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dr. Sudeep Veer
Adv. K SUDHAKAR REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India
-
2.The Principal Chief Personnel Officer
-
3.The Principal Chief Medical Director
-
4.The Chief Medical Superentendent
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda
-
15-Apr-2026
P.sam Koshy,narsing Rao NandikondaView PDF
The Telangana High Court found that of the 12 grounds cited by South Central Railway to reject the petitioner's request for extraordinary leave (EOL) and No Objection Certificate (NOC) to pursue a DM (Neurology) degree, only Ground 7 appeared valid. The court directed the railway to file an affidavit within 10 days clarifying the rules restricting EOL to once per career and whether other Indian Railway officers have received EOL for higher studies multiple times, with the case to be heard again on 27.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda
-
10-Apr-2026
P.sam Koshy,narsing Rao NandikondaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
P.sam Koshy,narsing Rao NandikondaView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/10934/2026
The Telangana High Court found that of the 12 grounds cited by South Central Railway to reject the petitioner's request for extraordinary leave (EOL) and No Objection Certificate (NOC) to pursue a DM (Neurology) degree, only Ground 7 appeared valid. The court directed the railway to file an affidavit within 10 days clarifying the rules restricting EOL to once per career and whether other Indian Railway officers have received EOL for higher studies multiple times, with the case to be heard again on 27.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts