Beeravelly Praveen Rao, vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5388/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010224202026
Filing Number
CRLP/6268/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLP/5388/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
J Sreenivas Rao
Coram
J Sreenivas Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Last updated 13-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Beeravelly Praveen Rao,
Adv. RAMAVARAM CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY
-
2.Beeravelly Lakshmi,
-
3.Beeravelly Akshaya Sai,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.XXXXXXXXXXXX
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
J Sreenivas RaoView PDF
The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition filed by three petitioners (parents and sister of an accused) seeking to quash FIR No. 55 of 2026 for offences under BNS Sections 69, 126(2), and 351(2). The court rejected the plea to quash proceedings but directed the investigating officer to strictly follow mandatory procedures under BNSS Section 35(3) and Supreme Court guidelines in the Arnesh Kumar case, allowing petitioners to submit their defense and documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
24-Apr-2026
Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
23-Apr-2026
Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
22-Apr-2026
Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
21-Apr-2026
Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
20-Apr-2026
Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
16-Apr-2026
For Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
10-Apr-2026
J Sreenivas RaoView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
J Sreenivas RaoView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/5388/2026
The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition filed by three petitioners (parents and sister of an accused) seeking to quash FIR No. 55 of 2026 for offences under BNS Sections 69, 126(2), and 351(2). The court rejected the plea to quash proceedings but directed the investigating officer to strictly follow mandatory procedures under BNSS Section 35(3) and Supreme Court guidelines in the Arnesh Kumar case, allowing petitioners to submit their defense and documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts