M. Shivaraj Swamy vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE — WP/11017/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010222962026

Filing Number

WP/16068/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/11017/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Coram

B.Vijaysen Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

REVENUE ( 37 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 13-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. Shivaraj Swamy

    Adv. Dr J VIPLAV BABU

  2. 2.M. Veeresh @ Madupathi Veeresh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR REVENUE

  2. 2.The District Collector

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  4. 4.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana disposed of the writ petition filed by two agricultural landowners seeking an Occupancy Rights Certificate for their land in Sangareddy District. The court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and decide the petitioners' application within eight weeks from the order date, taking into account the Tahsildar's report, without entering into merits. The petition was disposed of without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    B.Vijaysen Reddy

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    B.Vijaysen ReddyView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/11017/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana disposed of the writ petition filed by two agricultural landowners seeking an Occupancy Rights Certificate for their land in Sangareddy District. The court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and decide the petitioners' application within eight weeks from the order date, taking into account the Tahsildar's report, without entering into merits. The petition was disposed of without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case