Mohammed Meraj, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5225/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010221752026

Filing Number

CRLP/6178/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5225/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Meraj,

    Adv. MOHAMMED ADAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Sri I. Tarun Kumar,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Summary: The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition without quashing the FIR against Mohammed Meraj for food adulteration offences (BNS Sections 274, 275, 318(4)). The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer by April 18, 2026, and mandated strict compliance with Section 35(3) of BNSS procedures and *Arnesh Kumar* guidelines, allowing the petitioner to submit his reply/explanation with documents while cooperating with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5225/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition without quashing the FIR against Mohammed Meraj for food adulteration offences (BNS Sections 274, 275, 318(4)). The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer by April 18, 2026, and mandated strict compliance with Section 35(3) of BNSS procedures and *Arnesh Kumar* guidelines, allowing the petitioner to submit his reply/explanation with documents while cooperating with the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case