Jadi Murali vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/5002/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010212902026

Filing Number

CRLP/5900/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/5002/2026

Registration Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Other offences not covered(Misc.) ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jadi Murali

    Adv. KONDAGURLA PAVAN KALYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Mamidib Narsaiah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition filed by Jadi Murali (accused in a Section 420 IPC case) by dispensing with his personal appearance in trial proceedings, subject to representation by counsel at all hearings. The court found that the petitioner's grounds for quashing were disputed factual matters requiring full trial, but granted the exemption from attendance considering his status as a Government Teacher and the pre-examination stage of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/5002/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition filed by Jadi Murali (accused in a Section 420 IPC case) by dispensing with his personal appearance in trial proceedings, subject to representation by counsel at all hearings. The court found that the petitioner's grounds for quashing were disputed factual matters requiring full trial, but granted the exemption from attendance considering his status as a Government Teacher and the pre-examination stage of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case