Dr. Mahalakshmi, vs Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India — WP/11239/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010212822026
Filing Number
WP/15385/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/11239/2026
Registration Date
13-Apr-2026
Judge
Nagesh Bheemapaka
Coram
Nagesh Bheemapaka
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SECUNDERBAD CONTONMENT MATTERS ( 46 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dr. Mahalakshmi,
Adv. D RAMAKRISHNA
-
2.M.Padmavathi,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India Advocate - N BHUJANGA RAO Deputy Solicitor General of India
-
2.TheSecunderabad Cantonment Board,
Adv. K.R KOTESWERA RAO(SR SC FOR CANTONMENT)
-
3.The Station House Officer,
Adv. GP FOR HOME
-
4.Mr. Karthik,
-
5.Smt Paisa Padma Sree
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Admission (Central Govt.)
Nagesh Bheemapaka
-
09-Jun-2026
Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF
Case Summary: In WP/11239/2026 before the Telangana High Court, the petition filed by Dr. Mahalakshmi and M. Padmavathi against the Union of India and Secunderabad Cantonment Board was heard on 09.06.2026. The court adjourned the case to 16.06.2026 at the request of the respondents' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Admission (Central Govt.)
Nagesh Bheemapaka
-
08-Jun-2026
Nagesh BheemapakaView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
Admission (Central Govt.)
Renuka Yara
-
29-Apr-2026
Admission (Central Govt.)
Renuka Yara
-
15-Apr-2026
Renuka YaraView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Renuka YaraView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11239/2026
Case Summary: In WP/11239/2026 before the Telangana High Court, the petition filed by Dr. Mahalakshmi and M. Padmavathi against the Union of India and Secunderabad Cantonment Board was heard on 09.06.2026. The court adjourned the case to 16.06.2026 at the request of the respondents' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts