Mohammed Khamar @ Qamar vs The State of Telangana, Through S.H.O., P.S. Pocharam I.T. Corridor, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4942/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED NO COSTS on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010210722026
Filing Number
CRLP/5844/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLP/4942/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
K. Sujana
Coram
K. Sujana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohammed Khamar @ Qamar
Adv. K VENUMADHAV
-
2.Mohammed Shabir Shabbir
-
3.Syed Jafar @ Jafar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Through S.H.O., P.S. Pocharam I.T. Corridor, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
Summary The Telangana High Court partially granted the anticipatory bail petition. The court held that the dispute arose from long-standing civil litigation over land title and possession, and granted anticipatory bail to petitioners 1 and 3 (Mohammed Khamar and Syed Jafar) on conditions including personal bond of Rs. 25,000 each and weekly police reporting for 8 weeks. However, the court rejected bail for petitioner 2 due to specific allegations of active involvement in assaulting the complainant with a knife. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
For Orders
K. Sujana
-
20-Apr-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
K. Sujana
-
16-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
Interlocutory ( Anticipatory Bails)
K. Sujana
-
13-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
13-Apr-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
06-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4942/2026
Summary The Telangana High Court partially granted the anticipatory bail petition. The court held that the dispute arose from long-standing civil litigation over land title and possession, and granted anticipatory bail to petitioners 1 and 3 (Mohammed Khamar and Syed Jafar) on conditions including personal bond of Rs. 25,000 each and weekly police reporting for 8 weeks. However, the court rejected bail for petitioner 2 due to specific allegations of active involvement in assaulting the complainant with a knife. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts