Potlapati Mallikarjuna Reddy vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4906/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 13th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010209522026
Filing Number
CRLP/5813/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRLP/4906/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
K. Sujana
Coram
K. Sujana
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS
Last updated 19-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Potlapati Mallikarjuna Reddy
Adv. T SANJAY REDDY
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Potlapati Mallikarjuna Reddy, accused of offenses under Section 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding the relationship with the complainant was voluntary despite her allegations of threats, coercion, and blackmail. The court noted contradictions in the complainant's statements (claiming to be unmarried while actually married since 2018) and her prior legal notice demanding financial support, which suggested a consensual relationship. The petitioner must surrender within two weeks, execute a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, and report to the investigating officer every Monday until charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)
K. Sujana
-
06-Apr-2026
K. SujanaView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4906/2026
The Telangana High Court granted pre-arrest bail to Potlapati Mallikarjuna Reddy, accused of offenses under Section 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding the relationship with the complainant was voluntary despite her allegations of threats, coercion, and blackmail. The court noted contradictions in the complainant's statements (claiming to be unmarried while actually married since 2018) and her prior legal notice demanding financial support, which suggested a consensual relationship. The petitioner must surrender within two weeks, execute a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, and report to the investigating officer every Monday until charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts