Shaik Akbar Pasha, vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4927/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010207452026

Filing Number

CRLP/5768/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4927/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Other offences not covered(Misc.) ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shaik Akbar Pasha,

    Adv. GAJE RAGHU

  2. 2.Karisha Sai Karthik,

  3. 3.Vanama Naveen Kumar,

  4. 4.Samboju Ramu,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Sri. T. Vijaya Babu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court quashed criminal proceedings against four accused individuals charged with procuring PDS (Public Distribution System) rice from beneficiaries at cheaper rates for resale. The court found that absent allegations of deceptive inducement or dishonest misappropriation by beneficiaries, and without any complaint from beneficiaries themselves, the prosecution's case lacked essential elements of cheating under law, making continuation of proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4927/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court quashed criminal proceedings against four accused individuals charged with procuring PDS (Public Distribution System) rice from beneficiaries at cheaper rates for resale. The court found that absent allegations of deceptive inducement or dishonest misappropriation by beneficiaries, and without any complaint from beneficiaries themselves, the prosecution's case lacked essential elements of cheating under law, making continuation of proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case