Mohd.Abdul Jabbar vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING — WP/9860/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010204742026

Filing Number

WP/14771/2026

Filing Date

31-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/9860/2026

Registration Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

K. Sarath

Coram

K. Sarath

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohd.Abdul Jabbar

    Adv. C SAI REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

  2. 2.The State of Telangana

    Adv. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV

  3. 3.The Director of Treasuries and Accounts,

  4. 4.The District Treasury Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    K. SarathView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of a writ petition by a retired Assistant Engineer challenging the non-release of retirement benefits totaling approximately Rs. 64.46 lakhs despite token numbers being generated for payment. The court directed the state respondents to release the entire amount within six weeks, failing which 10% per annum interest would accrue from the date amounts fell due, citing an earlier Division Bench precedent on the same issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Admission (Finance and Planning)

    K. Sarath

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9860/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of a writ petition by a retired Assistant Engineer challenging the non-release of retirement benefits totaling approximately Rs. 64.46 lakhs despite token numbers being generated for payment. The court directed the state respondents to release the entire amount within six weeks, failing which 10% per annum interest would accrue from the date amounts fell due, citing an earlier Division Bench precedent on the same issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case