Naga Sai Jagan Mohan Sodarapu vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4707/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.

Next hearing 01-May-2026

CNR: HBHC010199972026

Filing Number

CRLP/5570/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4707/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naga Sai Jagan Mohan Sodarapu

    Adv. S SYAMSUNDER RAO

  2. 2.Sodarapu Nageswara Rao @ Vijay Kumar

  3. 3.Gade Kanakamahalakshmi

  4. 4.Sodarapu Bhavani Naga Swetha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Smt. Sodarapu Bhanu Sree @Bhanu Sree Kotichukkala

Case History

  1. 01-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-May-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Telangana issued a "Notice Before Admission" in Criminal Petition No. 4707 of 2026, directing the respondent (complainant) to show cause by 01.05.2026 why the petition to quash FIR No. 34 of 2026 should not be admitted. The Court found prima facie merit in the petitioners' arguments regarding procedural violations but declined to grant a stay of investigation, instead directing the Investigating Officer to follow mandatory BNSS procedures and Supreme Court guidelines per *Arnesh Kumar* while proceeding against the four accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4707/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Telangana issued a "Notice Before Admission" in Criminal Petition No. 4707 of 2026, directing the respondent (complainant) to show cause by 01.05.2026 why the petition to quash FIR No. 34 of 2026 should not be admitted. The Court found prima facie merit in the petitioners' arguments regarding procedural violations but declined to grant a stay of investigation, instead directing the Investigating Officer to follow mandatory BNSS procedures and Supreme Court guidelines per *Arnesh Kumar* while proceeding against the four accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case