Pogaku Shashidhar, vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION — WP/9606/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Status: Admission (Stamps And Registration ). Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Admission (Stamps And Registration ) Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HBHC010199792026

Filing Number

WP/14417/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/9606/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Pulla Karthik

Coram

Pulla Karthik

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TO RECEIVE AND REGISTER THE DOC ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pogaku Shashidhar,

    Adv. CHINNA POCHAIAH RAYAMALLA

  2. 2.Pogaku Rian,

  3. 3.Pogaku Ashitha,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION

  2. 2.The District Registrar,

  3. 3.The Sub-Registrar

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Admission (Stamps And Registration )

    Pulla Karthik

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Pulla KarthikView PDF

    Summary: The Telangana High Court granted interim suspension of the Sub-Registrar's Refusal Order No. 11 of 2026 (dated 16.03.2026), which had refused to register a cancellation deed for a gift of residential property. The court found the petitioners' (parents and son) submission that they intended to cancel the gift to fund the child's quality education prima facie reasonable. The matter is posted for further hearing on 23.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9606/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Telangana High Court granted interim suspension of the Sub-Registrar's Refusal Order No. 11 of 2026 (dated 16.03.2026), which had refused to register a cancellation deed for a gift of residential property. The court found the petitioners' (parents and son) submission that they intended to cancel the gift to fund the child's quality education prima facie reasonable. The matter is posted for further hearing on 23.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case