Chitikela Sayanna vs The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV — WP/9585/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HBHC010198872026
Filing Number
WP/14350/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/9585/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
E.V. Venugopal
Coram
E.V. Venugopal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., ( 35 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 27-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chitikela Sayanna
Adv. K SHYAM SUNDER RAO
-
2.Chitikela Yadaiah
-
3.Chitikela Ramesh
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Telangana Advocate - GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
-
2.The Commissioner
-
3.The District Collector
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
-
4.The District Panchayat Officer,
-
5.The Mandal Parishad Development Officer
-
6.The Panchayat Secretary.
Adv. PRADEEP REDDY KATTA (SC FOR TG ZILLA PARISHAD)
-
7.Sri Chitikela Ravinder
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
Admission (Panchayat Raj)
E.V. Venugopal
-
31-Mar-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
-
31-Mar-2026
E.V. VenugopalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Telangana issued a notice before admission order in Writ Petition No. 9585 of 2026. The petitioners sought a Writ of Mandamus against panchayat officials for failing to take action against respondent No. 7 based on their representations. The court directed notice to be issued to respondent No. 7 to show cause why the petition should not be admitted, with the case adjourned to 16.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/9585/2026
Summary: The High Court of Telangana issued a notice before admission order in Writ Petition No. 9585 of 2026. The petitioners sought a Writ of Mandamus against panchayat officials for failing to take action against respondent No. 7 based on their representations. The court directed notice to be issued to respondent No. 7 to show cause why the petition should not be admitted, with the case adjourned to 16.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts