Pannalal Arun Choudary, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4691/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010198772026

Filing Number

CRLP/5535/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4691/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pannalal Arun Choudary,

    Adv. CHAITHANYA K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana granted bail to Pannalal Arun Choudary, accused of dowry harassment and abetment of suicide under BNS Section 80 and DP Act Sections 3-4. The court found that while the allegations are serious, the harassment claims were disclosed only four months after witness statements, investigation was substantially complete with 18 witnesses examined, and the petitioner had been incarcerated since January 28, 2026. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 25,000 personal bond with sureties and weekly police reporting for eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4691/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana granted bail to Pannalal Arun Choudary, accused of dowry harassment and abetment of suicide under BNS Section 80 and DP Act Sections 3-4. The court found that while the allegations are serious, the harassment claims were disclosed only four months after witness statements, investigation was substantially complete with 18 witnesses examined, and the petitioner had been incarcerated since January 28, 2026. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 25,000 personal bond with sureties and weekly police reporting for eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case