BAYYA RAMESH, vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4685/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010198522026

Filing Number

CRLP/5528/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4685/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.P.C r/w 457 - Release of Vehicle ( 126 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAYYA RAMESH,

    Adv. ARVAPALLI SHIVA SAI NATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROH. AND EXCISE,

  3. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    The Telangana High Court granted interim release of a seized Ashok Leyland lorry to its owner Bayya Ramesh, who was not an accused in the case. The court found that since investigation was complete and the vehicle owner would suffer hardship, releasing the vehicle would cause no prejudice to prosecution. The release was granted on condition of a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with two sureties, an undertaking not to alienate the vehicle, and submission to court orders under the Prohibition Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4685/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court granted interim release of a seized Ashok Leyland lorry to its owner Bayya Ramesh, who was not an accused in the case. The court found that since investigation was complete and the vehicle owner would suffer hardship, releasing the vehicle would cause no prejudice to prosecution. The release was granted on condition of a Rs. 50,000 personal bond with two sureties, an undertaking not to alienate the vehicle, and submission to court orders under the Prohibition Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case