Kadire Nagaraju, vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4719/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED NO COSTS on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010198352026

Filing Number

CRLP/5523/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4719/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kadire Nagaraju,

    Adv. Dr. RAVI KUMAR N

  2. 2.Kadire Parvathamma,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.The Station House Officer, Bijinapally Police Station,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court partially allowed the bail petition for accused Nos. 2 and 3 in a death case. The court denied bail to petitioner No. 1, finding him allegedly actively participated in the assault with accused No. 1, but granted bail to petitioner No. 2 (a woman) on conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and weekly police reporting. The court reasoned that the evidence against petitioner No. 2 was insufficient for detention, while petitioner No. 1's involvement appeared more substantial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Orders

    K. Sujana

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4719/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court partially allowed the bail petition for accused Nos. 2 and 3 in a death case. The court denied bail to petitioner No. 1, finding him allegedly actively participated in the assault with accused No. 1, but granted bail to petitioner No. 2 (a woman) on conditions including a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and weekly police reporting. The court reasoned that the evidence against petitioner No. 2 was insufficient for detention, while petitioner No. 1's involvement appeared more substantial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case