Mohd Waseem vs The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4668/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Next hearing 30-Apr-2026

CNR: HBHC010197982026

Filing Number

CRLP/5514/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4668/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohd Waseem

    Adv. SANJEEVA REDDY GARLAPATI

  2. 2.Mohd Amer,

  3. 3.Jabri @ Mohd Bin Abdullah Jabri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Mohammed Pasha,

Case History

  1. 30-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Case Summary The Telangana High Court issued a notice before admission on Criminal Petition No. 4668 of 2026. Three accused persons challenged criminal proceedings (Case No. 446/2025) at Balapur Police Station, arguing they were falsely implicated and that the allegations were civil in nature. The Court found prima facie merit in the petitioners' arguments but declined to stay investigation proceedings. The Investigating Officer was directed to follow mandatory BNSS procedures and Supreme Court guidelines (Arnesh Kumar case) while continuing investigation. The case is posted for 30.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4668/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Telangana High Court issued a notice before admission on Criminal Petition No. 4668 of 2026. Three accused persons challenged criminal proceedings (Case No. 446/2025) at Balapur Police Station, arguing they were falsely implicated and that the allegations were civil in nature. The Court found prima facie merit in the petitioners' arguments but declined to stay investigation proceedings. The Investigating Officer was directed to follow mandatory BNSS procedures and Supreme Court guidelines (Arnesh Kumar case) while continuing investigation. The case is posted for 30.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case