Paladugula Kiran Kumar vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4790/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010197852026

Filing Number

CRLP/5507/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4790/2026

Registration Date

31-Mar-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the F.I.R ( 63 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Paladugula Kiran Kumar

    Adv. NAGARAJU ALLAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Kalyani Supriya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition filed by Dr. Paladugula Kiran Kumar, who was accused under Sections 74, 75, and 79 BNS. While rejecting the petition's plea to quash the proceedings, the court found that the accused was entitled to submit his reply and supporting documents before the Investigating Officer, who had already issued notice under Section 35(3) BNSS on 16.03.2026. The court directed the Investigating Officer to scrupulously follow BNSS procedures and Supreme Court guidelines (Arnesh Kumar case) while concluding the investigation, with the accused's cooperation required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4790/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court disposed of the criminal petition filed by Dr. Paladugula Kiran Kumar, who was accused under Sections 74, 75, and 79 BNS. While rejecting the petition's plea to quash the proceedings, the court found that the accused was entitled to submit his reply and supporting documents before the Investigating Officer, who had already issued notice under Section 35(3) BNSS on 16.03.2026. The court directed the Investigating Officer to scrupulously follow BNSS procedures and Supreme Court guidelines (Arnesh Kumar case) while concluding the investigation, with the accused's cooperation required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case