Dongari Venkataram, vs The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4741/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010197592026

Filing Number

CRLP/5497/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4741/2026

Registration Date

31-Mar-2026

Judge

J Sreenivas Rao

Coram

J Sreenivas Rao

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.482 Cr.p.c Other offences not covered(Misc.) ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 19-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dongari Venkataram,

    Adv. NARENDAR JALLI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

  2. 2.Smt. Barishetti Sandhya,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    J Sreenivas RaoView PDF

    The Telangana High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition to quash criminal proceedings against him for charges under Sections 74, 79, 353(1), and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding specific allegations in the complaint that require adjudication by the trial court. However, the court dispensed with the petitioner's physical presence in court given his advanced age, allowing him to be represented by counsel at all hearings, with the condition that he must appear if specifically required by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    J Sreenivas Rao

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4741/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Telangana High Court dismissed the petitioner's petition to quash criminal proceedings against him for charges under Sections 74, 79, 353(1), and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, finding specific allegations in the complaint that require adjudication by the trial court. However, the court dispensed with the petitioner's physical presence in court given his advanced age, allowing him to be represented by counsel at all hearings, with the condition that he must appear if specifically required by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case