Nagelly Srikanth Reddy alias Srikanth, vs State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4680/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010197452026

Filing Number

CRLP/5491/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4680/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nagelly Srikanth Reddy alias Srikanth,

    Adv. MALCHALMRE HARI VASTAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana, Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court granted bail to Nagelly Srikanth Reddy, accused of offenses under Sections 69 and 318(4) of the BNS in a case involving alleged sexual exploitation under promise of marriage. The court found that substantial investigation was completed with ten prosecution witnesses examined, the accused had been incarcerated since March 10, 2026, and bail conditions were appropriate. Bail was approved subject to a Rs. 25,000 personal bond with sureties and weekly reporting to police for eight weeks or until charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4680/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court granted bail to Nagelly Srikanth Reddy, accused of offenses under Sections 69 and 318(4) of the BNS in a case involving alleged sexual exploitation under promise of marriage. The court found that substantial investigation was completed with ten prosecution witnesses examined, the accused had been incarcerated since March 10, 2026, and bail conditions were appropriate. Bail was approved subject to a Rs. 25,000 personal bond with sureties and weekly reporting to police for eight weeks or until charge sheet filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case