M/s Arrow Cables Limited vs The State of Telangana Advocate - Special Govt Pleader for State Tax — WP/9515/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: HBHC010197262026

Filing Number

WP/14247/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/9515/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda

Coram

P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MISCELLANEOUS ( 33 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s Arrow Cables Limited

    Adv. KALAMATA RAGHU BABU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana Advocate - Special Govt Pleader for State Tax

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

  3. 3.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)

  4. 4.The Commercial Tax Officer

  5. 5.The Commissioner of Industries

    Adv. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    P.sam Koshy , Narsing Rao Nandikonda

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    P.sam Koshy,narsing Rao NandikondaView PDF

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    P.sam Koshy,narsing Rao NandikondaView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana granted a stay on coercive action against Arrow Cables Limited regarding a GST demand notice issued by the 3rd respondent, and adjourned the matter to 27.04.2026 for substantive hearing. The petitioner was given extended time to comply with the tax demand, with the respondents restrained from taking enforcement steps in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9515/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana granted a stay on coercive action against Arrow Cables Limited regarding a GST demand notice issued by the 3rd respondent, and adjourned the matter to 27.04.2026 for substantive hearing. The petitioner was given extended time to comply with the tax demand, with the respondents restrained from taking enforcement steps in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case