M.A. Shareef vs State of Telangana Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL — WP/9314/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HBHC010193122026

Filing Number

WP/13934/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/9314/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Coram

Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

WPs Challanging the Vires of Rules/Section/Acts. incl Tax ( 87 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Last updated 27-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.A. Shareef

    Adv. D JAGAN MOHAN REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Telangana Advocate - THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

  2. 2.State of Telangana

    Adv. GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Telangana adjourned the hearing of five consolidated writ petitions (W.P.Nos.4566, 4383, 4625, 9294, and 9314 of 2026) on 16.04.2026. The court granted one week's time to the respondents to file a counter-affidavit, with petitioners allowed to file a reply within one week thereafter. The case was listed for further hearing after the specified timeline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Fresh Matters)

    Aparesh Kumar Singh , G.M. Mohiuddin

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Aparesh Kumar Singh,g.m. MohiuddinView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9314/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Telangana adjourned the hearing of five consolidated writ petitions (W.P.Nos.4566, 4383, 4625, 9294, and 9314 of 2026) on 16.04.2026. The court granted one week's time to the respondents to file a counter-affidavit, with petitioners allowed to file a reply within one week thereafter. The case was listed for further hearing after the specified timeline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case