CHERUPALLIKAL NINEESH vs The Superintendent of Customs (Preventive) Hyderabad Advocate - DOMINIC FERNANDES (senior standing counsel for CBIC) — CRLP/4472/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010189122026

Filing Number

CRLP/5258/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4472/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480,483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHERUPALLIKAL NINEESH

    Adv. KHAJA ARAJUDDIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Superintendent of Customs (Preventive) Hyderabad Advocate - DOMINIC FERNANDES (senior standing counsel for CBIC)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    The High Court of Telangana granted the petitioner's application to reduce the surety bond amount from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000, while maintaining the requirement of two sureties. The court approved this reduction after hearing arguments from the petitioner's counsel and the Additional Public Prosecutor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  6. 31-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4472/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Telangana granted the petitioner's application to reduce the surety bond amount from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 10,000, while maintaining the requirement of two sureties. The court approved this reduction after hearing arguments from the petitioner's counsel and the Additional Public Prosecutor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case