SYED ISMAIL , vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4385/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010187072026

Filing Number

CRLP/5202/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4385/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.437 and 439 Cr.p.c Regular Bail ( 62 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED NO COSTS

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480&483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SYED ISMAIL ,

    Adv. D B CHAITANYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF TELANGANA Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Telangana granted bail to Syed Ismail, accused of offences under Section 78 BNS, Section 12 POCSO Act, and SC/ST (POA) Act 2015, involving allegations of harassing a minor girl. The court found that investigation was substantially complete with 14 prosecution witnesses already examined, and the petitioner's prolonged incarceration since January 28, 2026 was unjustified. Bail was granted subject to a Rs. 25,000 personal bond with two sureties and weekly police reporting for eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory (Regular Bails)

    K. Sujana

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Telangana granted bail to Syed Ismail, accused of offences under Section 78 BNS, Section 12 POCSO Act, and SC/ST (POA) Act 2015, involving allegations of harassing a minor girl. The court found that investigation was substantially complete with 14 prosecution witnesses already examined, and the petitioner's prolonged incarceration since January 28, 2026 was unjustified. Bail was granted subject to a Rs. 25,000 personal bond with two sureties and weekly police reporting for eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case