G. Sriram Naik vs The State of Telangana. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4348/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HBHC010186762026

Filing Number

CRLP/5195/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRLP/4348/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

K. Sujana

Coram

K. Sujana

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRLP ( 41 )

Sub-Category

U/s.438 Cr.p.c Anticipatory Bail ( 61 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL Section

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G. Sriram Naik

    Adv. K SAI BABU

  2. 2.Smt. N. Uma Bai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Telangana. Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

    Summary The Telangana High Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by accused Nos. 2 and 4 in a dowry harassment and cheating case registered in 2010, ruling that they should have first approached the trial court for recall of the Non-Bailable Warrant instead of directly approaching the High Court. The court directed the petitioners to surrender before the trial court and file a recall petition, which the trial court must consider expeditiously in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Interlocutory(fresh Bail Petitions)

    K. Sujana

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    K. SujanaView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLP/4348/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Telangana High Court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by accused Nos. 2 and 4 in a dowry harassment and cheating case registered in 2010, ruling that they should have first approached the trial court for recall of the Non-Bailable Warrant instead of directly approaching the High Court. The court directed the petitioners to surrender before the trial court and file a recall petition, which the trial court must consider expeditiously in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case