Ankit Gupta vs State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR — CRLP/4661/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CNR: HBHC010184042026
Filing Number
CRLP/5119/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRLP/4661/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
J Sreenivas Rao
Coram
J Sreenivas Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRLP ( 41 )
Sub-Category
U/s.482 Cr.p.c Quash the proceedings U/s.498-A I.P.C ( 65 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL Section
Last updated 26-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ankit Gupta
Adv. D S V G NAGARAJU
-
2.Amit Gupta
-
3.Sangita Gupta
-
4.Shubhi Gupta
-
5.Vaibhav Gupta
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Telangana Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
2.Priyanka Goel,
Adv. S RAMA MOHAN RAO
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
For Admission
J Sreenivas Rao
-
31-Mar-2026
J Sreenivas RaoView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Telangana adjourned Criminal Petition No.4661 of 2026 to 27.04.2026 for final orders. The parties settled their dispute through a Memorandum of Understanding dated 06.06.2024, wherein petitioner No.1 agreed to pay Rs.11,00,000 as permanent alimony, obtained mutual consent divorce on 14.07.2024, and the respondent withdrew the domestic violence case. Proceedings will be quashed upon full payment of the settlement amount on or before 25.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRLP/4661/2026
Summary: The High Court of Telangana adjourned Criminal Petition No.4661 of 2026 to 27.04.2026 for final orders. The parties settled their dispute through a Memorandum of Understanding dated 06.06.2024, wherein petitioner No.1 agreed to pay Rs.11,00,000 as permanent alimony, obtained mutual consent divorce on 14.07.2024, and the respondent withdrew the domestic violence case. Proceedings will be quashed upon full payment of the settlement amount on or before 25.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts